Back to skills
Request Analyzer
Analyze incoming user requests to detect intent, request type (design/validate/debug/document), complexity level, and identify vague requirements or buzzwords that need clarification. Use when cto-orchestrator receives new requests that need classification before routing to specialist agents.
32 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 12/19/2025
data-aigosqlnodedebuggingcode-reviewdatabasebackenddocumentation
Install via CLI
$
openskills install alirezarezvani/claude-cto-teamFiles
SKILL.md
---
name: request-analyzer
description: Analyze incoming user requests to detect intent, request type (design/validate/debug/document), complexity level, and identify vague requirements or buzzwords that need clarification. Use when cto-orchestrator receives new requests that need classification before routing to specialist agents.
---
# Request Analyzer
Classifies incoming requests to enable intelligent routing and identify clarification needs before delegating to specialist agents.
## When to Use
- When receiving a new user request that needs classification
- When determining which specialist agent should handle a request
- When identifying if requirements are too vague to proceed
- When detecting buzzwords that need to be challenged
## Analysis Framework
### Step 1: Detect Intent
Classify the primary intent:
| Intent | Indicators | Route |
|--------|------------|-------|
| **Strategic** | "roadmap", "strategy", "plan", "prioritize", "decide" | May need validation |
| **Implementation** | "build", "create", "implement", "design", "architect" | Design work |
| **Debugging** | "fix", "broken", "error", "slow", "not working" | Debug/investigate |
| **Documentation** | "document", "explain", "describe", "write docs" | Documentation |
### Step 2: Classify Request Type
| Type | Key Phrases | Primary Agent |
|------|-------------|---------------|
| **Design** | "How should I build...", "What architecture...", "Design a system..." | cto-architect |
| **Validate** | "Is this plan solid?", "Thoughts on...", "Review my roadmap..." | strategic-cto-mentor |
| **Debug** | "Why is X slow?", "Fix this error...", "Troubleshoot..." | debug-helper |
| **Document** | "Write documentation for...", "Explain how..." | docs-writer |
| **Review** | "Review this code...", "Check for issues..." | code-reviewer |
### Step 3: Assess Complexity
| Complexity | Characteristics | Execution Pattern |
|------------|-----------------|-------------------|
| **Single** | Clear scope, one domain, obvious routing | Direct to one agent |
| **Sequential** | Multiple phases, depends on previous output | Agent chain |
| **Parallel** | Independent domains, can run simultaneously | Multiple agents in parallel |
### Step 4: Identify Vague Terms
Scan for buzzwords that require clarification. See [buzzword-dictionary.md](buzzword-dictionary.md) for the complete list.
**Common red flags:**
- "AI-powered" - What specific AI capability?
- "scale" - What numbers? From what to what?
- "fast" / "soon" - What timeline exactly?
- "simple" - Simple for whom? What constraints?
- "modern" - What specific technologies?
### Step 5: Detect Missing Context
Check for required context based on request type:
**For Design Requests:**
- [ ] Expected user/traffic scale
- [ ] Budget constraints
- [ ] Timeline requirements
- [ ] Team size and expertise
- [ ] Existing infrastructure
**For Validation Requests:**
- [ ] Current state or existing plan
- [ ] Business goals and constraints
- [ ] Timeline and resources
- [ ] Success criteria
## Output Format
Provide analysis in this structure:
```
## Request Analysis
**Intent**: [strategic | implementation | debugging | documentation]
**Type**: [design | validate | debug | document | review]
**Complexity**: [single | sequential | parallel]
### Vague Terms Detected
- "[term]" - needs clarification: [what to ask]
### Missing Context
- [missing information item]
### Suggested Routing
**Primary Agent**: [agent name]
**Rationale**: [why this agent]
### Clarification Needed
[yes/no] - [brief explanation]
### Recommended Next Step
[what to do next - clarify or delegate]
```
## Examples
### Example 1: Vague Request
**User**: "I want to add AI capabilities to my app"
**Analysis**:
- **Intent**: Implementation
- **Type**: Design
- **Complexity**: Unknown (needs clarification)
- **Vague Terms**: "AI capabilities" - What specific problem are we solving?
- **Missing Context**: Scale, budget, timeline, team, existing stack
- **Clarification Needed**: Yes
- **Next Step**: Use clarification-protocol before routing
### Example 2: Clear Design Request
**User**: "Design a real-time notification system for 100K users, using our existing PostgreSQL database and Node.js backend"
**Analysis**:
- **Intent**: Implementation
- **Type**: Design
- **Complexity**: Single
- **Vague Terms**: None
- **Missing Context**: Timeline, budget (nice to have but not blocking)
- **Suggested Routing**: cto-architect
- **Clarification Needed**: No (can proceed with optional clarification)
### Example 3: Validation Request
**User**: "Here's my Q2 roadmap - migrate to microservices, add real-time features, and launch mobile app. Thoughts?"
**Analysis**:
- **Intent**: Strategic
- **Type**: Validate
- **Complexity**: Single
- **Vague Terms**: None
- **Missing Context**: Team size, current architecture state
- **Suggested Routing**: strategic-cto-mentor
- **Clarification Needed**: Mild (some context helpful but not blocking)
## References
- [Classification Criteria](classification-criteria.md) - Detailed routing logic
- [Buzzword Dictionary](buzzword-dictionary.md) - Common vague terms to challenge
Attribution
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
